by Mark Summerfield @ Patentology As many readers will be aware, Australia has a pre-grant opposition procedure which can be used to challenge a decision of the Australian Patent Office to issue a patent. Opposition proceedings are conducted before the Patent Office, and are initiated by the opponent filing a Notice of Opposition. There is, however, [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...By HELEN CHENG @ Allen & Overy On December 16, 2011, without much fanfare, the Chinese Supreme People’s Court (“the SPC”) issued judicial guidelines for IP infringement adjudication entitled “Opinion on Several Issues Relating to Sufficient Utilization of IP Adjudication to Foster Development and Prosperity of Socialist Culture and to Promote Autonomous and Coordinated Economic Development” (the [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...by Steven Musil February 9, 2012 Web companies such as Google and Amazon won a closely watched patent-infringement lawsuit today when a jury ruled that a patent central to the complaint was invalid. A federal jury in Tyler, Texas, deliberated for just a few hours this afternoon before concluding that all of Eolas Technologies’ claims of ownership to [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...Posted by Jeremy at IPKat Thursday, 9 February 2012 A very busy little book buzzed into this Kat’s life a few days ago. It’s called Why Has America Stopped Inventing? and its author is an energetic, indeed frenetic patent attorney by the name of Darin Gibby (his own website is here; his web page with Kilpatrick Townsend is here). Darin is not one [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...Thomson Reuters | BRUSSELS | Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:51am EST Jan 31 (Reuters) – The European Commission opened an investigation into whether Samsung Electronics has distorted competition in the European mobile device market, breaking EU antitrust rules, the EU executive arm said in a statement on Tuesday. The Commission said that last year Samsung sought injunctions in various [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...