by Dan @ Chinalawblog A reporter called me the other day on the Apple-Proview trademark kerfuffle. She kept wanting me to give her a quote on what foreign companies should take away from this dispute and I kept parrying with her, unable to give her just one. I kept finding myself saying “it’s probably more complicated [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...by Dan @ Chinalawblog on December 30, 2011 Just got back from a family vacation in Puerto Rico. While there, I saw a rental car company called “Target.” This company had the same logo as theTarget stores so common on the U.S. mainland. Well of course that got me to thinking. Is this rental car company infringing on [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...by Michael M. Ratoza The year 2011 produced many significant IP cases, some of which were discussed in previous posts in this blog. Here are some highlights: Georgia State University: College Course Electronic Packets ~ Cambridge University Press v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia (08-cv-1425, N.D. Georgia). This case remains pending before Judge Orinda D. [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...By John L. Welch @ the TTABlog Section 2(a) – Immoral or Scandalous: Precedential No. 25: TTAB Finds Raised Middle Finger Design for Bottle to be Scandalous or Immoral, Affirms 2(a) Refusal Section 2(d) – likelihood of confusion: Precedential No. 32: CLASSIC AMERICAN BLEND Confusingly Similar to CLASSIC CANADIAN for Tobacco, Says TTAB Precedential No. 27: [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...by ipwars.com Last week the parties were in court fighting over discovery. By the tie of the hearing what was actually in dispute was quite narrow. In the end, Dodds-Streeton J ruled that Coca Cola should be allowed to get discovery amongst other things from Schweppes, Pepsi’s bottler in Australia, relating to whether or not [...]
No Comments. Continue Reading...